Broken Promises and Coca Eradication in Peru
March 2005
Recommendations
- After being in effect for 43 years, the various schemes for reducing supply, which are spelled out in international treaties on drugs, should be reviewed.
- Eradication, spraying and even substitution-based rural development have proven largely ineffective, harmful and indiscriminate, and have seriously violated basic collective rights.
- These measures contradict international, constitutional and legislative norms that seek recognition of and respect for people's culture and traditions.
- Regulations on illicit crops that were drawn up in 1961 and 1988 conflict with higher-level international norms on the protection of collective rights, which were established later. Authorities — judges, police, district attorneys and other officials — should keep these in mind when enforcing policies.
- Countries like Peru and Bolivia should build a solid partnership to work to change the international control system, beginning with the coca leaf, and adopt specific measures for liberalising it, with regard to traditional markets.
Series:
Drug Policy Briefing 11 Upcoming events
-
EU in Crisis
May 2012
Brussels, Belgium




![image[node-id]](http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/imagecache/4teaser-small/reports-images/graphic1.gif)

![image[node-id]](http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/imagecache/4teaser-small/reports-images/landgrab.jpg)
![image[node-id]](http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/imagecache/4teaser-small/reports-images/green-economy_page_01.jpg)
![image[node-id]](http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/imagecache/4teaser-small/reports-images/brazilsugarcanepath.jpg)