The Politics of Glyphosate

The CICAD Study on the Impacts of Glyphosate and the Crop Figures

1 June 2005
Twitter Facebook Forward Print HTML

The Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD), an agency affiliated with the OAS, recently joined the large number of existing scientific studies on the possible health and environmental effects of Round Up, the glyphosate formula being sprayed on illicit crops in Colombia. CICAD’s investigation, under the direction of an international scientific team, concluded that the chemicals used in the spraying — glyphosate and Cosmo-Flux — do not affect human health or the environment, and that at most they could cause temporary skin and eye irritation, but serious doubts exist. The National University of Colombia’s Environmental Studies Institute published a critical analysis of the CICAD study, which considered technical aspects of the investigation, finding methodological shortcomings, as well as omissions and inconsistencies throughout the report. Those findings could point to a lack of impartiality in the CICAD study.

application/pdf iconDownload the briefing (90 KB)


Recommendations

  • The CICAD study of the impacts of glyphosate spraying has been the subject of much criticism. The researchers involved in the study should respond to this criticism and explain the shortcomings and omissions that have been pointed out by various experts.
  • The Colombian Ombudsman's Office has registered some 8,000 health-related complaints from people in the areas sprayed. By ignoring these complaints, the researchers demonstrated a lack of respect for the affected population, carrying out the study as if nothing had happened.
  • The Colombian government should make public the new Round Up formula currently being used for spraying. No conclusion can be drawn about its harmlessness if the concentration of chemicals used in the spraying is unknown.
  • Aside from the harm to human health and the environment, aerial spraying has created greater instability in the regions and has contributed to the displacement of crops. It therefore should not be proposed as a long-term solution and should be suspended.

 

Drug Policy Briefings
June 2005
application/pdf iconDownload the briefing (90 KB)

Recent publications from Drugs and Democracy

De wankelende ‘Weense consensus’ over drugsbeleid

Nederland is met zijn drugsbeleid in de achterhoede terecht gekomen. Zo zijn Uruguay en de Amerikaanse staten Washington en Colorado, met hun besluit de cannabismarkt van teelt tot gebruik te legaliseren, Nederland voorbijgestreefd.

Between Reality and Abstraction

At the International Conference on Alter­native Development (ICAD), held 15-16 November 2012 in Lima, the Peruvian Government continued to insist on the relevance of “Alternative Development (AD),” with particular emphasis on the so-called San Martín “miracle” or “model.”

The illicit drugs market in the Colombian agrarian context

The distribution of land and its unjust use are the major causes of violence in Colombia. For this reason land issues are the starting point of current peace talks between the Santos government and the FARC guerrillas

Bogotá’s medical care centres for drug addicts

The opening in September 2012 of the first centre for drug addicts in Bogota is a welcome first step towards more humane and effective drug policies in Colombia’s capital city, but to be effective needs to be integrated into proper overall drugs strategy.