Debating Europe "For a just EU investment policy"
Watch the heated debate among representatives from the European Commission, the Belgium government and civil society on the issue of EU Investment policy.
The agenda of Investment issues has currently acquired a high political profile in the Europe Union (EU), where under the Lisbon Treaty, competency for investment shifted from the member states to the EU level. Investment is increasingly promoted as a development tool by the EU and its member states. At the same time, there is a growing international recognition that business activities, in particular those of powerful transnational investors, can have serious and far-reaching effects on human rights and sustainable development.
For two hours, a heated debate took place among panellists who discussed the current EU investment policy as well as alternatives policy proposals to the current Member States Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) model. A well-informed audience also raised questions on key issues of concerns such as the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism and the fact that EU BITs do not provide enough policy space for countries to regulate in public interest.
PANELLISTS:
• Mr Leopoldo Rubinacci, Head of Unit, Services and investment (B1), DG Trade, European Commission
• Mr. Pascal Buffin, Belgian representative in the Trade Policy Committee, European Council
• Mr. Marc Maes, 11.11.11
MODERATOR
• Juliane von Reppert Bismarck, EU trade correspondent, Reuters
|
|
The Debate started with initial short presentations from each panellist. You can move trough the presentations by cliking on next button: - 05:27 - Mr. Marc Maes, 11.11.11 - 12:50 - Mr Leopoldo Rubinacci, European Commission - 22:31 - Mr. Pascal Buffin, Belgian representative, European Council |
|
|
The Debate continued with responses from panellists and questions from the floor. You can move trough the different sections by cliking on next button: 00:00 - Mr Rubinacci replying to comments |
|
|
The Debate continued with more questions from the floor and responses from Mr Rubinacci and Mr Buffin. You can move trough the different sections by cliking on next button: 00:00 - Questions from the floor: Alberto Arroyo (Mexico) |
|
|
The Debate ended with some last questions from the floor and final remarks from Mr Rubinacci and Mr Buffin. You can move trough the different sections by cliking on next button: 00:00 - Exchange between Cecilia Olivet and Mr. Buffin on the right of government to regulate. |
|
Sorry, you need to install flash to see this content.
|
Recent publications from Trade & Investment
The right to say noAs European Union (EU) member states consider the implications of environmentally risky shale gas development (fracking), negotiations are underway for a controversial EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) which would grant investors the right to challenge governments’ decision to ban and regulate fracking. |
The EU trade and Investment Agenda: quashing the aspirations of the Arab Spring?The EU's launch of negotiations for Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreements (DCFTAs) with four Arab countries in transition – Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Tunisia - looks set to entrench an economic model that was one of the root causes of the Arab Spring. |
Balancing Trade and AidBalancing Trade and Aid With the arrival of the Rutte II cabinet, a wish of the members of the Fair, Green and Global Alliance (FGG) has come true; trade and global development are under the supervision of the same minister. |
Intra-EU Bilateral Investment TreatiesCorporations in Western Europe are suing Central and Eastern European countries at international arbitration tribunals through a vast web of intra-EU Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs). Yet while the European Commission has questioned the validity of these BITs, Netherlands, Germany, and the UK, oppose their termination. |




