Delegates to the Our Oceans conference are gathering to discuss ocean sustainability, but there’s a big problem: their proposals will only sanitize continued resource extraction and environmental and ecological degradation.
Le dernier document présenté fin novembre à Paris aux négociations onusiennes pour le climat, est très bavard : exactement 32 731 mots. Et pourtant un mot n’y apparaît pas : celui de « dépenses militaires ». Bien troublant, lorsque l’on songe que l’armée des USA est à elle seule le premier consommateur de pétrole au monde et exerce depuis des décennies le principal contrôle sur l’économie pétrolière mondiale.
In addition to having a strategic role as a provider of jobs, food needs, and economic sustainability, small-scale fisheries also become an important driver in conserving fish and natural resources through a variety of local knowledge.
There is no shortage of words in the latest negotiating document for the UN climate negotiations taking place in Paris at the end of November – 32,731 words to be precise and counting. Yet strangely there is one word you won’t find: military. It’s a strange omission, given that the US military alone is the single largest user of petroleum in the world and has been the main enforcer of the global oil economy for decades.
From a climate justice perspective, which is more than a technical approach, we are facing a political and paradigm-related dilemma. From this perspective, we focus on the root causes of the climate crisis from where we propose real solutions while rejecting and demanding an end to false solutions.