Rewriting history

A response to the 2008 World Drug Report
01 ဇွန်လ 2008
Policy briefing

The 2008 UN World Drug Report tries to hide the failures of drug control policy behind a bad history lesson. Instead of a clear acknowledgement that the UN’s own 10-year targets have not been met, it offers a narrative of 100 years of success, fabricating a comparison with Chinese opium production and use at the turn of the 20th century.

The world today is not any closer to achieving the ten-year targets set by the 1998 UN General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) on drugs. These goals were “elimi­nating or significantly reducing the illicit cultivation of coca bush, the cannabis plant and the opium poppy by the year 2008.” Instead global production of opiates and cocaine has significantly increased over the last ten years. According to the United Na­tions Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) global illicit opium production doubled from 4,346 tons in 1998 to 8,800 tons in 2007. This is mainly due to the massi­ve increase in opium production in Afghanistan. The estimated global cocaine produc­tion increased from 825 tons in 1998 to 994 tons in 2007, an increase of 20%.

Ten years of failure

In the past decade international drug control emphasised eradication of illicit crops, before having alternative livelihoods in place. Hundreds of thousands of peasants have been condemned to poverty and robbed of a life in dignity. In several key producing countries, crop eradication has aggravated violent conflict rather than contribu­ting to conflict resolution.

By 2007 Afghanistan was producing some 8,200 tons of opium, or 93% of global production. These record production levels have led to more aggressive forced eradication of opium crops. Apart from causing immense suffering to local communities, these campaigns have significantly contributed to the growing insecurity in the country.

In Colombia, ten years of indiscriminate aerial spraying of coca crops have failed to reduce coca cultivation, while creating a vicious circle of human, so­cial and environ­mental damage, displacement, human right violations and fuelled the decades-old civil conflict in the country.

Opium production in the Golden Triangle (Burma, Thailand and Laos) – once the world’s largest producer - has indeed declined from 1.435 metric tons in 1998 to 472 metric tons in 2007, or 5% of global production. Those who are paying the price for this trend are the opium farmers, who need the income from opium to buy food and medicines.

Key points

  • The 1998 UNGASS targets of reducing opium and coca culti­vation have not been met. In the last ten years global opium production doubled and cocaine pro­duc­tion increased with 20%.
  • The WDR uses twisted logic to fabricate comparisons with higher opium production a century ago, and the figures used in the report are controversial.
  • China did not have ‘tens of millions of opium addicts’. Opium use in China was mostly moderate and relatively non-problematic, often for medical use.
  • Early inter­natio­nal drug control agreements helped to reduce legal production and trade; the current UN con­ventions have not curbed the illicit market.
  • It is a mystery how a comparison between 1000 tonnes of cocaine produced now for an illicit market and the 15 tonnes licitly produced before cocaine was under inter­national control can be presented as a success.
  • The zero-tolerance punitive framework that replaced the early regulatory model resulted in the unintended consequences mentioned in the WDR.
  • The prohibition regime has led to limited availability of essential medicines.
  • The current approach to drug control has failed. Instead of unrealistic targets, there is a need for a more rational, pragmatic and humane approach.
  • The WDR proposals to make the system ‘fit for purpose’ by a focus on crime pre­vent­ion, harm reduction and human rights are welcome, but require the undoing of the punitive nature of the treaties.

Pages: 10

Rewriting history(pdf, 182.24 ကီလိုဘိုက်)