Do Purchases Motivated by Symbolic and Social Needs Undermine Food Sovereignty?

Fecha de publicación:

Food sovereignty is defined as “the right of peoples to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods, and their right to define their own food and agriculture systems”

do_purchase_motivated_by_symbolic_and_social_needs_undermine_food_sovereignty

Sobre do purchases motivated by symbolic and social needs undermine food sovereignty?

Tipo de publicación
Paper

Autores

Autores

Jill Richardson

Food sovereignty is defined as “the right of peoples to healthy and culturally appropriate food produced through ecologically sound and sustainable methods, and their right to define their own food and agriculture systems” (Declaration of Nyéléni). While physical and economic needs such as secure land tenure and access to seeds must be met to achieve food sovereignty, there are also psychological needs at play. This paper examines the extent to which feelings that ones’ traditional foods and farming itself are “backwards,” “primitive,” or “low class” undermine food sovereignty by driving people to adopt purchased (often nutritionally inferior) foods.

Jill Richardson,  Freelance writer, based in San Diego Jill Richardson is the author of Recipe for America: Why Our Food System is Broken and What We Can Do To Fix It.

Food Sovereignty: a critical dialogue, 14 - 15 September, New Haven.

Ideas en movimiento

Impulsa nuestra labor

Si deseas apoyar nuestro trabajo, considera realizar una donación. Nos comprometemos a que nuestra valiosa investigación esté accesible sin costo, pero para eso necesitamos de tu ayuda. Si todas las personas que leen nuestro contenido realizan una donación de tan solo €12 podremos apoyar nuestro trabajo durante tres años.

Done Ahora